Comments on: Recent Terror Plot

By: gajdaman

gajdaman — Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:36:19 +0000

Good day to everyone!
I just read this article and few others by Mr.McMoneagle,for what articles I wasnt still aware at the time I wrote the comment for his article “Fear and what to fear”.I am deeper and deeper confused on your position,Mr.McMoneagle.And this time I will be short.
Do you really believe Sir,that the airforce war game “Vigilant Guardian “(strangely enough with TOP SECRET marking) on 911 and NORAD stand-down were accidental(the last one is actually a mater of record!)?Do you really believe few islamic wannabe-pilots with box-cutters can overcome the most sofisticated military machine in the world and hit their targets(and got their passports found on the street around the WTC2 and 3?! I laugh especially at this one :)?
Thats just a scratch on the surface….
Yes,I am Mr.Nobody Jackass.
But what about Mr.David Shayler(former MI5 agent) and Mrs.Annie Machon(former MI5 agent),Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Beulow,the Member of The British Parlament Michael Meacher,Ray McGovern(former CIA analist for Reagan and Bush sr.) and so on,and on? They all agree 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!
What about them? Would you call these people conspiracy nuts?
I just cannot explaine for myself how you Sir,a person with such a record in the intelligence,can keep on singing the lullabies about the “evil muslim fanatics,running around our great country and brewing doom for our citizens”.Yes,the muslim extremists are bad(we have tryed their sword and fire in my country too for 500 years),yes they kill innocent people!
No doubt about that?
But do you really believe they have chances against the western society,exept if certain forces in that society do want to let them act and even worse,support them? After all isnt it Al-Queda a CIA creation?
The only explanation for me is that either you are suffering an aging dementia(what I highly deny) or you are terribly afraid to speak up the truth(what shows me the US has really entered into the police state situation…
I wish it would be a beam of light from somewhere…

By: greeneye

greeneye — Mon, 04 Sep 2006 23:03:52 +0000

Joe wrote:”If it means we have to fight in our backyards, so be it. Maybe we need to renew our fight for the freedoms we have enjoyed so long here in our great country. Too many Americans talk about their freedoms and don’t really understand what it means to fight and die for them — al-Qaida does!”

I get that. Not all, but too many Americans are complacent and comfortable with their toys and trappings, and haven’t a clue what really goes on in areas of conflict. Unfortunately, bringing it onshore with 9/11, wore off too soon as well. Thought I don’t mean to sound as though I want that to happen again.

I have thought since 9/11, that we cant be so sure the “enemy”will always aim for a coastal city with beloved landmarks. I’m afraid aiming at the heartland would truely be aiming at Americas heart, and greater psychi.

greeneye

By: curiouscat

curiouscat — Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:55:28 +0000

I believe you Joe, but, how we do stop such terrorist action before it occurs without tipping off Al Qaeda?

By: 46L353E

46L353E — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:54:48 +0000

Joe,

When you receive visual information, does it have a “character” or “flavor” that differs from normal dream imagery or from “daydream” imagery? If “yes”, can you describe how it differs? If “no, can you describe what tells you that this imagery is relevant to the target?

I ask because the visuals that I get when practicing have a very 3D sort of vibe to them and the Audio is also very refined as well. I want to make sure I am placing a fair amount of priority to the right info. Thank you.

By: mike kinch

mike kinch — Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:49:26 +0000

i used my ESP and came across about 24 dark energy forms , and they will die in the attack. with 9/11/06 just around the bend, i hope you and other RV’s are going find them before they hit.

By: mike kinch

mike kinch — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:52:57 +0000

hi ,joe
It is good to see that you and others are helping out DOD with your RV. while i took a RV from you at RRC. i would like to help you,for RV is just one of many ESP gifts that peolpe have. i gave you a card with my phone number on it.call me please. mike kinch

By: an

an — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:44:29 +0000

Hello Joe,
IF the following article has some truth in it then the consequences of what you described as a nuclear attack on 4 major cities in the USA, may expand into extremely dangerous uncharted territories for the World.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060810&articleId=2942

We all want this NOT to happen, don’t we ?

Peace,
An.

By: an

an — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:54:05 +0000

Hi Joe, I’m writting from France and english is not my mother tong,

I don’t know where to put the following information. It deals with a very large scale of problems the world is facing now. However one key element is the energy crisis initiated by the peaking of world oil production or so called “peak oil”. Try http://www.energybulletin.net/primer.php and http://www.theoildrum.com/storyonly/2006/3/1/3402/63420 .

I’ve got the feeling that we are living in deep changing times, in fact unprecedented historical times (the great depression in the 30’s followed by WWII may be taken as a weak example to have some basis).

The path that the USA administration has taken raises a lot of questions. The synthesis of those questions may be seen in the following website. But before reading it I must warn that it is very provocative and that the main author of the website may be considered a traitor to the USA.So here is the link : http://www.fromthewilderness.com/

I totally agree that terrorism and al-qaida is a bad thing. However it may be not the only thing to concentrate on : it is a top priority to deal with terrorism and even more if a terrorist attack involving dirty bombs has a good chance to occur but it is also a necessity to see the big picture and to be opened to other possibilities.

I dare to write this to you because I know from what I’ve read that your are honest and I respect what you’ve done in the Remote Viewing realm and also because I believe we are not living in normal times.

I’m seeking comments and critics. In addition I’m not sure it is appropriate to write about these issues on this blog : tell me.

Peace,
An.

By: MarkT

MarkT — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:06:44 +0000

An interesting related article: Mass Murder In The Skies: was the plot feasible?

From the last paragraph:
“Our official protectors and deciders trumpet the fools they catch because they haven’t got a handle on the people we should really be afraid of. They make policy based on foibles and follies, and Hollywood plots.”

No kidding.

By: Eva

Eva — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:21:56 +0000

Yeah, unfortunately we keep repeating the same historical mistakes over and over again. And Mark, dirty bombs can seriously contaminate an area at least a few blocks wide. Even just taking down a major freeway causes major disaster in some big cities. Also consider that reporters have been able to experimentally transport radioactive materials in planes and via shipping routes without being caught, even when they were trying to be deliberately obvious. They were doing it to check the US monitoring abilities and let’s just say, results were not encouraging! Our borders are not secure in any way.
-E

By: MarkT

MarkT — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:59:47 +0000

What this? Joe isn’t just about RV? Fantastic!! We want more!

Dirty bombs: I’m no terrorism expert, but I thought “dirty bombs” were not effective weapons due to the difficult problem of how to expose victims. And radioactive material is pretty easy to detect and requires highly-skilled handling. If terrorists want headlines there are many simpler and more effective ways of getting them.

That said, I have had a gut feeling for a few years now (and a dream or two) that a certain major citywas in the crosshairs for just such an attack. I’d be willing to bet its one of the cities on your list. I’ve only “seen” this one city gettng attacked, however.

As for the media, I think you give them far more credit than they deserve. Few in the media business have the patience and intelligence to adequately understand these sophisticated plots, nor the time (nor audience attention span) to explain them in any dangerous detail.

I don’t believe terrorists gain much tactical information from watching tape of their attacks. I think what they do learn they gain from painstakingly staking out their targets, trying little things here and there and seeing what works. What IS dangerous is when certain people who should know better goad them to “bring it on.”

I do believe what you said, though, about Iraq. If we had terrorists before we invaded, we’ve got far more of them now.

Cheers!
Mark Turner
USN ‘88-’92

By: Eric

Eric — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:56:41 +0000

“…so al-Qaida and their wannabes, can go screw themselves!”

That had me chuckling, I couldnt agree more. I cant believe how much the news media lines out the “how-tos” for these guys. There was a pretty hilarious bit on “The Daily Show” about how bad the press really lays out how to terrorise america. Silly.

Still, I hope everyone stays safe and these guys get nailed prior to doing anything bad.

Eric